🔥 New notation for RigidStabilizer and prove first lemma for proposition 3.5

laurent-lost-commits
Shad Amethyst 11 months ago
parent 522f345f34
commit 24dd2c4f0a

@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ lemma lemma_2_2 (G: Type _) {α : Type _} [Group G] [TopologicalSpace α] [MulAc
[ContinuousMulAction G α] [FaithfulSMul G α]
[T2Space α] [h_lm : LocallyMoving G α]
{U : Set α} (U_open : IsOpen U) (U_nonempty : Set.Nonempty U) :
Monoid.exponent (RigidStabilizer G U) = 0 :=
Monoid.exponent G•[U] = 0 :=
by
by_contra exp_ne_zero
@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ lemma proposition_2_1 {G α : Type _}
[Group G] [TopologicalSpace α] [MulAction G α] [ContinuousMulAction G α] [T2Space α]
[LocallyMoving G α] [h_faithful : FaithfulSMul G α]
(f : G) :
AlgebraicCentralizer f = RigidStabilizer G (RegularSupport α f) :=
AlgebraicCentralizer f = G•[RegularSupport α f] :=
by
ext h
@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ by
theorem rigidStabilizer_inter_bot_iff_regularSupport_disj {G α : Type _}
[Group G] [TopologicalSpace α] [MulAction G α] [ContinuousMulAction G α] [LocallyMoving G α] [FaithfulSMul G α]
{f g : G} :
RigidStabilizer G (RegularSupport α f) ⊓ RigidStabilizer G (RegularSupport α g) = ⊥
G•[RegularSupport α f] ⊓ G•[RegularSupport α g] = ⊥
↔ Disjoint (RegularSupport α f) (RegularSupport α g) :=
by
rw [<-rigidStabilizer_inter]
@ -782,34 +782,23 @@ def RSuppOrbit {G α : Type _} [Group G] [TopologicalSpace α] [MulAction G α]
{ g •'' W | (g ∈ H) (W ∈ F) }
lemma moving_elem_of_open_subset_closure_orbit {U V : Set α} (U_open : IsOpen U) (U_nonempty : Set.Nonempty U)
{p : α} (p_in_V : p ∈ V) (U_ss_clOrbit : U ⊆ closure (MulAction.orbit (RigidStabilizer G V) p)) :
∃ h : G, h ∈ RigidStabilizer G V ∧ h • p ∈ U :=
{p : α} (U_ss_clOrbit : U ⊆ closure (MulAction.orbit G•[V] p)) :
∃ h : G, h ∈ G•[V] ∧ h • p ∈ U :=
by
have U_ss_clV : U ⊆ closure V := by
apply subset_trans
exact U_ss_clOrbit
apply closure_mono
exact orbit_rigidStabilizer_subset p_in_V
by_cases (RigidStabilizer G V) = ⊥
case pos rist_bot =>
rw [rist_bot] at U_ss_clOrbit
simp at U_ss_clOrbit
use 1
constructor
exact Subgroup.one_mem _
rw [one_smul]
let ⟨q, q_in_U⟩ := U_nonempty
rw [<-U_ss_clOrbit _ q_in_U]
assumption
case neg rist_ne_bot =>
rw [<-ne_eq, Subgroup.ne_bot_iff_exists_ne_one] at rist_ne_bot
let ⟨⟨g, g_in_rist⟩, g_ne_one⟩ := rist_ne_bot
rw [ne_eq, Subgroup.mk_eq_one_iff, <-ne_eq] at g_ne_one
have p_in_orbit : p ∈ MulAction.orbit G•[V] p := by simp
-- Idea: show that `U ∩ Orb(p, G_U)` is nonempty?
sorry
have ⟨q, ⟨q_in_U, q_in_orbit⟩⟩ := inter_of_open_subset_of_closure
U_open U_nonempty ⟨p, p_in_orbit⟩ U_ss_clOrbit
rw [MulAction.mem_orbit_iff] at q_in_orbit
let ⟨⟨h, h_in_orbit⟩, hq_eq_p⟩ := q_in_orbit
simp at hq_eq_p
use h
constructor
assumption
rw [hq_eq_p]
assumption
lemma compact_subset_of_rsupp_basis [LocallyCompactSpace α]
(U : RegularSupportBasis α):
@ -885,6 +874,8 @@ by
simp at W_in_subsets
let ⟨W_in_basis, W_subset_rsupp⟩ := W_in_subsets
clear W_in_subsets g' g'_ne_one
unfold RSuppOrbit
simp
-- We have that W is a subset of the closure of the orbit of G_U
have W_ss_clOrbit : W ⊆ closure (MulAction.orbit (↥(RigidStabilizer G U.val)) p) := by
@ -899,9 +890,8 @@ by
rw [<-closure_closure (s := MulAction.orbit _ _)]
apply closure_mono
assumption
unfold RSuppOrbit
simp
-- W is also open and nonempty...
have W_open : IsOpen W := by
let ⟨W', W'_eq⟩ := (RegularSupportBasis.mem_asSet _).mp W_in_basis
rw [<-W'_eq]
@ -911,8 +901,8 @@ by
rw [<-W'_eq]
exact W'.nonempty
-- We get an element `h` such that `h • p ∈ W` and `h ∈ G_U`
let ⟨h, h_in_rist, hp_in_W⟩ := moving_elem_of_open_subset_closure_orbit W_open W_nonempty p_in_U W_ss_clOrbit
-- So we can get an element `h` such that `h • p ∈ W` and `h ∈ G_U`
let ⟨h, h_in_rist, hp_in_W⟩ := moving_elem_of_open_subset_closure_orbit W_open W_nonempty W_ss_clOrbit
use h
constructor

@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ class LocallyDense (G α : Type _) [Group G] [TopologicalSpace α] [MulAction G
#align is_locally_dense Rubin.LocallyDense
theorem LocallyDense.from_rigidStabilizer_in_nhds (G α : Type _) [Group G] [TopologicalSpace α] [MulAction G α] :
(∀ U : Set α, IsOpen U → ∀ p ∈ U, closure (MulAction.orbit (RigidStabilizer G U) p) ∈ 𝓝 p) →
(∀ U : Set α, IsOpen U → ∀ p ∈ U, closure (MulAction.orbit G•[U] p) ∈ 𝓝 p) →
LocallyDense G α :=
by
intro hyp
@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ theorem LocallyDense.rigidStabilizer_in_nhds (G α : Type _) [Group G] [Topologi
[MulAction G α] [LocallyDense G α]
{U : Set α} (U_open : IsOpen U) {p : α} (p_in_U : p ∈ U)
:
closure (MulAction.orbit (RigidStabilizer G U) p) ∈ 𝓝 p :=
closure (MulAction.orbit G•[U] p) ∈ 𝓝 p :=
by
rw [mem_nhds_iff]
rw [<-mem_interior]
@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ lemma LocallyDense.elem_from_nonEmpty {G α : Type _} [Group G] [TopologicalSpac
∀ {U : Set α},
IsOpen U →
Set.Nonempty U →
∃ p ∈ U, p ∈ interior (closure (MulAction.orbit (RigidStabilizer G U) p)) :=
∃ p ∈ U, p ∈ interior (closure (MulAction.orbit G•[U] p)) :=
by
intros U U_open H_ne
exact ⟨H_ne.some, H_ne.some_mem, LocallyDense.isLocallyDense U U_open H_ne.some H_ne.some_mem⟩
@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ theorem get_moving_elem_in_rigidStabilizer (G : Type _) {α : Type _}
[Group G] [TopologicalSpace α] [MulAction G α] [LocallyDense G α]
[T1Space α] {p : α} [Filter.NeBot (𝓝[≠] p)]
{U : Set α} (U_open : IsOpen U) (p_in_U : p ∈ U) :
∃ g : G, g ∈ RigidStabilizer G U ∧ g • p ≠ p :=
∃ g : G, g ∈ G•[U] ∧ g • p ≠ p :=
by
by_contra g_not_exist
rw [<-Classical.not_forall_not] at g_not_exist
@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ theorem LocallyMoving.get_nontrivial_rist_elem {G α : Type _}
{U: Set α}
(U_open : IsOpen U)
(U_nonempty : U.Nonempty) :
∃ x : G, x ∈ RigidStabilizer G U ∧ x ≠ 1 :=
∃ x : G, x ∈ G•[U] ∧ x ≠ 1 :=
by
have rist_ne_bot := h_lm.locally_moving U U_open U_nonempty
exact (or_iff_right rist_ne_bot).mp (Subgroup.bot_or_exists_ne_one _)

@ -11,7 +11,14 @@ def rigidStabilizer' (G : Type _) [Group G] [MulAction G α] (U : Set α) : Set
{g : G | ∀ x : α, g • x = x x ∈ U}
#align rigid_stabilizer' Rubin.rigidStabilizer'
-- A subgroup of G for which `Support α g ⊆ U`, or in other words, all elements of `G` that don't move points outside of `U`.
/--
A "rigid stabilizer" is a subgroup of `G` associated with a set `U` for which `Support α g ⊆ U` is true for all of its elements.
In other words, a rigid stabilizer for a set `U` contains all elements of `G` that don't move points outside of `U`.
The notation for this subgroup is `G•[U]`.
You might sometimes find an expression written as `↑G•[U]` when `G•[U]` is used as a set.
--/
def RigidStabilizer (G : Type _) [Group G] [MulAction G α] (U : Set α) : Subgroup G
where
carrier := {g : G | ∀ (x) (_ : x ∉ U), g • x = x}
@ -20,6 +27,8 @@ def RigidStabilizer (G : Type _) [Group G] [MulAction G α] (U : Set α) : Subgr
one_mem' x _ := one_smul G x
#align rigid_stabilizer Rubin.RigidStabilizer
notation:max G "•[" U "]" => RigidStabilizer G U
variable {G α: Type _}
variable [Group G]
variable [MulAction G α]
@ -50,7 +59,7 @@ by
theorem monotone_rigidStabilizer : Monotone (RigidStabilizer (α := α) G) := fun _ _ => rigidStabilizer_mono
theorem rigidStabilizer_compl [FaithfulSMul G α] {U : Set α} {f : G} (f_ne_one : f ≠ 1) :
f ∈ RigidStabilizer G (Uᶜ) → f ∉ RigidStabilizer G U :=
f ∈ G•[Uᶜ] → f ∉ G•[U] :=
by
intro f_in_rist_compl
intro f_in_rist
@ -60,16 +69,6 @@ by
have supp_empty : Support α f = ∅ := empty_of_subset_disjoint f_in_rist_compl.symm f_in_rist
exact f_ne_one ((support_empty_iff f).mp supp_empty)
-- TODO: remove?
theorem rigidStabilizer_to_subgroup_closure {U : Set α} :
RigidStabilizer G U = Subgroup.closure { h : G | Support α h ⊆ U } :=
by
ext g
simp only [<-rigidStabilizer_support]
have set_eq : {h | h ∈ RigidStabilizer G U} = (RigidStabilizer G U : Set G) := rfl
rw [set_eq]
rw [Subgroup.closure_eq]
theorem commute_if_rigidStabilizer_and_disjoint {g h : G} {U : Set α} [FaithfulSMul G α] :
g ∈ RigidStabilizer G U → Disjoint U (Support α h) → Commute g h :=
by
@ -129,7 +128,7 @@ by
}
theorem rigidStabilizer_inter (U V : Set α) :
RigidStabilizer G (U ∩ V) = RigidStabilizer G U ⊓ RigidStabilizer G V :=
G•[U ∩ V] = G•[U] ⊓ G•[V] :=
by
ext x
simp
@ -137,7 +136,7 @@ by
rw [Set.subset_inter_iff]
theorem rigidStabilizer_empty (G α: Type _) [Group G] [MulAction G α] [FaithfulSMul G α]:
RigidStabilizer G (α := α) ∅ = ⊥ :=
G•[(∅ : Set α)] = ⊥ :=
by
rw [Subgroup.eq_bot_iff_forall]
intro f f_in_rist
@ -149,7 +148,7 @@ by
simp
theorem rigidStabilizer_sInter (S : Set (Set α)) :
RigidStabilizer G (⋂₀ S) = ⨅ T ∈ S, RigidStabilizer G T :=
G•[⋂₀ S] = ⨅ T ∈ S, G•[T] :=
by
ext x
rw [rigidStabilizer_support]
@ -172,7 +171,7 @@ by
exact x_in_rist T_in_S
theorem rigidStabilizer_smulImage (f g : G) (S : Set α) :
g ∈ RigidStabilizer G (f •'' S) ↔ f⁻¹ * g * f ∈ RigidStabilizer G S :=
g ∈ G•[f •'' S] ↔ f⁻¹ * g * f ∈ G•[S] :=
by
repeat rw [rigidStabilizer_support]
nth_rw 3 [<-inv_inv f]
@ -181,7 +180,7 @@ by
simp
theorem orbit_rigidStabilizer_subset {p : α} {U : Set α} (p_in_U : p ∈ U):
MulAction.orbit (RigidStabilizer G U) p ⊆ U :=
MulAction.orbit G•[U] p ⊆ U :=
by
intro q q_in_orbit
have ⟨⟨h, h_in_rist⟩, hp_eq_q⟩ := MulAction.mem_orbit_iff.mp q_in_orbit

@ -69,6 +69,36 @@ theorem equivariant_inv [MulAction G α] [MulAction G β]
open Topology
-- Note: this sounds like a general enough theorem that it should already be in mathlib
lemma inter_of_open_subset_of_closure {α : Type _} [TopologicalSpace α] {U V : Set α}
(U_open : IsOpen U) (U_nonempty : Set.Nonempty U) (V_nonempty : Set.Nonempty V)
(U_ss_clV : U ⊆ closure V) : Set.Nonempty (U ∩ V) :=
by
by_contra empty
rw [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at empty
rw [Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at U_nonempty
apply U_nonempty
have clV_diff_U_ss_V : V ⊆ closure V \ U := by
rw [Set.subset_diff]
constructor
exact subset_closure
symm
rw [Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
exact empty
have clV_diff_U_closed : IsClosed (closure V \ U) := by
apply IsClosed.sdiff
exact isClosed_closure
assumption
unfold closure at U_ss_clV
simp at U_ss_clV
specialize U_ss_clV (closure V \ U) clV_diff_U_closed clV_diff_U_ss_V
rw [Set.subset_diff] at U_ss_clV
rw [Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty] at U_ss_clV
simp at U_ss_clV
exact U_ss_clV.right
/--
Note: `𝓝[≠] x` is notation for `nhdsWithin x {[x]}ᶜ`, ie. the neighborhood of x not containing itself.
--/

Loading…
Cancel
Save