🎉 Finish exercise sheet 1

amethyst
Shad Amethyst 8 months ago
parent 7fd0a910ae
commit b0a5c90ebb

@ -508,5 +508,90 @@ Qed.
Lemma ltr_steps_big_step e (v: val):
rtc ltr_step e v big_step e v.
Proof.
(* TODO: exercise *)
Admitted.
intro H.
remember (of_val v) eqn:H_val in H.
induction H; subst.
apply big_step_vals.
remember ((IHrtc (eq_refl (of_val v)))) as IH.
clear HeqIH.
clear IHrtc.
(* This is ridiculous. *)
revert H0.
revert IH.
revert v.
induction H; intros v IH H_rtc.
- destruct (is_val_to_of_val H) as [ e'_v H_val ].
rewrite H_val.
eapply bs_app.
apply bs_lam.
apply big_step_vals.
rewrite <-H_val.
assumption.
- inversion IH; subst.
eapply bs_app.
apply IHltr_step.
exact H2.
apply big_step_ltr_steps.
all: eauto.
- inversion IH; subst.
eapply bs_app.
exact H3.
apply IHltr_step.
exact H4.
apply big_step_ltr_steps.
all: eauto.
- inversion IH; subst.
eauto.
- inversion IH; subst.
assert (big_step e1 (LitIntV z1)).
{
apply IHltr_step.
assumption.
apply big_step_ltr_steps.
assumption.
}
eauto.
- inversion IH; subst.
assert (big_step e2 (LitIntV z2)).
{
apply IHltr_step.
assumption.
apply big_step_ltr_steps.
assumption.
}
eauto.
Qed.
Theorem steps_iff_ltr_steps e v :
rtc step e (of_val v) rtc ltr_step e (of_val v).
Proof.
split.
- intro H.
apply big_step_ltr_steps.
apply steps_big_step.
assumption.
- intro H.
apply big_step_steps.
apply ltr_steps_big_step.
assumption.
Qed.
(*
This result is unlike languages like javascript, where mutation cause a dependence on the execution order:
```
let x = 0;
function hof() {
x *= 2;
return (_) => x;
}
function inc() {
x += 1;
return x;
}
console.log((hof())(inc()));
// prints 1 if hof() is called before inc() (current behavior)
// prints 2 if inc() is called before hof()
```
*)

Loading…
Cancel
Save