|
|
|
|
/-
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright (c) 2023 Laurent Bartholdi. All rights reserved.
|
|
|
|
|
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
|
|
|
|
|
Author : Laurent Bartholdi
|
|
|
|
|
-/
|
|
|
|
|
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Basic
|
|
|
|
|
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Card
|
|
|
|
|
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Perm
|
|
|
|
|
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Subgroup.Basic
|
|
|
|
|
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Commutator
|
|
|
|
|
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Basic
|
|
|
|
|
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Exponent
|
|
|
|
|
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Basic
|
|
|
|
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Basic
|
|
|
|
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.Compact
|
|
|
|
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation
|
|
|
|
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Homeomorph
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import Rubin.Tactic
|
|
|
|
|
import Rubin.MulActionExt
|
|
|
|
|
import Rubin.SmulImage
|
|
|
|
|
import Rubin.Support
|
|
|
|
|
import Rubin.Topological
|
|
|
|
|
import Rubin.RigidStabilizer
|
|
|
|
|
import Rubin.Period
|
|
|
|
|
import Rubin.AlgebraicDisjointness
|
|
|
|
|
import Rubin.RegularSupport
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#align_import rubin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
namespace Rubin
|
|
|
|
|
open Rubin.Tactic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- TODO: find a home
|
|
|
|
|
theorem equiv_congr_ne {ι ι' : Type _} (e : ι ≃ ι') {x y : ι} : x ≠ y → e x ≠ e y :=
|
|
|
|
|
by
|
|
|
|
|
intro x_ne_y
|
|
|
|
|
by_contra h
|
|
|
|
|
apply x_ne_y
|
|
|
|
|
convert congr_arg e.symm h <;> simp only [Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
|
|
|
|
|
#align equiv.congr_ne Rubin.equiv_congr_ne
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
section Rubin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
variable {G α β : Type _} [Group G]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
section RubinActions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
structure RubinAction (G α : Type _) extends
|
|
|
|
|
Group G,
|
|
|
|
|
TopologicalSpace α,
|
|
|
|
|
MulAction G α,
|
|
|
|
|
FaithfulSMul G α
|
|
|
|
|
where
|
|
|
|
|
locally_compact : LocallyCompactSpace α
|
|
|
|
|
hausdorff : T2Space α
|
|
|
|
|
no_isolated_points : Rubin.has_no_isolated_points α
|
|
|
|
|
locallyDense : LocallyDense G α
|
|
|
|
|
#align rubin_action Rubin.RubinAction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
end RubinActions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
section proposition_2_1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
variable {G α : Type _}
|
|
|
|
|
variable [Group G]
|
|
|
|
|
variable [MulAction G α]
|
|
|
|
|
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
|
|
|
|
|
variable [T2Space α]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lemma proposition_2_1 (f : G) :
|
|
|
|
|
Set.centralizer { g^12 | (g : G) (_ : AlgebraicallyDisjoint f g) } = RigidStabilizer G (RegularSupport α f) :=
|
|
|
|
|
by
|
|
|
|
|
sorry
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
end proposition_2_1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
-- section finite_exponent
|
|
|
|
|
-- lemma coe_nat_fin {n i : ℕ} (h : i < n) : ∃ (i' : fin n), i = i' := ⟨ ⟨ i, h ⟩, rfl ⟩
|
|
|
|
|
-- variables [topological_space α] [continuous_mul_action G α] [has_faithful_smul G α]
|
|
|
|
|
-- lemma distinct_images_from_disjoint {g : G} {V : set α} {n : ℕ}
|
|
|
|
|
-- (n_pos : 0 < n)
|
|
|
|
|
-- (h_disj : ∀ (i j : fin n) (i_ne_j : i ≠ j), disjoint (g ^ (i : ℕ) •'' V) (g ^ (j : ℕ) •'' V)) :
|
|
|
|
|
-- ∀ (q : α) (hq : q ∈ V) (i : fin n), (i : ℕ) > 0 → g ^ (i : ℕ) • (q : α) ∉ V :=
|
|
|
|
|
-- begin
|
|
|
|
|
-- intros q hq i i_pos hcontra,
|
|
|
|
|
-- have i_ne_zero : i ≠ (⟨ 0, n_pos ⟩ : fin n), { intro, done },
|
|
|
|
|
-- have hcontra' : g ^ (i : ℕ) • (q : α) ∈ g ^ (i : ℕ) •'' V, exact ⟨ q, hq, rfl ⟩,
|
|
|
|
|
-- have giq_notin_V := Set.disjoint_left.mp (h_disj i (⟨ 0, n_pos ⟩ : fin n) i_ne_zero) hcontra',
|
|
|
|
|
-- exact ((by done : g ^ 0 •'' V = V) ▸ giq_notin_V) hcontra
|
|
|
|
|
-- end
|
|
|
|
|
-- lemma moves_inj_period {g : G} {p : α} {n : ℕ} (period_eq_n : period p g = n) : function.injective (λ (i : fin n), g ^ (i : ℕ) • p) := begin
|
|
|
|
|
-- have period_ge_n : ∀ (k : ℕ), 1 ≤ k → k < n → g ^ k • p ≠ p,
|
|
|
|
|
-- { intros k one_le_k k_lt_n gkp_eq_p,
|
|
|
|
|
-- have := period_le_fix (nat.succ_le_iff.mp one_le_k) gkp_eq_p,
|
|
|
|
|
-- rw period_eq_n at this,
|
|
|
|
|
-- linarith },
|
|
|
|
|
-- exact moves_inj_N period_ge_n
|
|
|
|
|
-- end
|
|
|
|
|
-- lemma lemma_2_2 {α : Type u_2} [topological_space α] [continuous_mul_action G α] [has_faithful_smul G α] [t2_space α]
|
|
|
|
|
-- (U : set α) (U_open : is_open U) (locally_moving : is_locally_moving G α) :
|
|
|
|
|
-- U.nonempty → monoid.exponent (rigid_stabilizer G U) = 0 :=
|
|
|
|
|
-- begin
|
|
|
|
|
-- intro U_nonempty,
|
|
|
|
|
-- by_contra exp_ne_zero,
|
|
|
|
|
-- rcases (period_from_exponent U U_nonempty exp_ne_zero) with ⟨ p, g, n, n_pos, hpgn, n_eq_Sup ⟩,
|
|
|
|
|
-- rcases disjoint_nbhd_fin (moves_inj_period hpgn) with ⟨ V', V'_open, p_in_V', disj' ⟩,
|
|
|
|
|
-- dsimp at disj',
|
|
|
|
|
-- let V := U ∩ V',
|
|
|
|
|
-- have V_ss_U : V ⊆ U := Set.inter_subset_left U V',
|
|
|
|
|
-- have V'_ss_V : V ⊆ V' := Set.inter_subset_right U V',
|
|
|
|
|
-- have V_open : is_open V := is_open.inter U_open V'_open,
|
|
|
|
|
-- have p_in_V : (p : α) ∈ V := ⟨ subtype.mem p, p_in_V' ⟩,
|
|
|
|
|
-- have disj : ∀ (i j : fin n), ¬ i = j → disjoint (↑g ^ ↑i •'' V) (↑g ^ ↑j •'' V),
|
|
|
|
|
-- { intros i j i_ne_j W W_ss_giV W_ss_gjV,
|
|
|
|
|
-- exact disj' i j i_ne_j
|
|
|
|
|
-- (Set.subset.trans W_ss_giV (smul''_subset (↑g ^ ↑i) V'_ss_V))
|
|
|
|
|
-- (Set.subset.trans W_ss_gjV (smul''_subset (↑g ^ ↑j) V'_ss_V)) },
|
|
|
|
|
-- have ristV_ne_bot := locally_moving V V_open (Set.nonempty_of_mem p_in_V),
|
|
|
|
|
-- rcases (or_iff_right ristV_ne_bot).mp (Subgroup.bot_or_exists_ne_one _) with ⟨h,h_in_ristV,h_ne_one⟩,
|
|
|
|
|
-- rcases faithful_rist_moves_point h_in_ristV h_ne_one with ⟨ q, q_in_V, hq_ne_q ⟩,
|
|
|
|
|
-- have hg_in_ristU : (h : G) * (g : G) ∈ rigid_stabilizer G U := (rigid_stabilizer G U).mul_mem' (rist_ss_rist V_ss_U h_in_ristV) (subtype.mem g),
|
|
|
|
|
-- have giq_notin_V : ∀ (i : fin n), (i : ℕ) > 0 → g ^ (i : ℕ) • (q : α) ∉ V := distinct_images_from_disjoint n_pos disj q q_in_V,
|
|
|
|
|
-- have giq_ne_q : ∀ (i : fin n), (i : ℕ) > 0 → g ^ (i : ℕ) • (q : α) ≠ (q : α),
|
|
|
|
|
-- { intros i i_pos giq_eq_q, exact (giq_eq_q ▸ (giq_notin_V i i_pos)) q_in_V, },
|
|
|
|
|
-- have q_in_U : q ∈ U, { have : q ∈ U ∩ V' := q_in_V, exact this.1 },
|
|
|
|
|
-- -- We have (hg)^i q = g^i q for all 0 < i < n
|
|
|
|
|
-- have pow_hgq_eq_pow_gq : ∀ (i : fin n), (i : ℕ) < n → (h * g) ^ (i : ℕ) • q = (g : G) ^ (i : ℕ) • q,
|
|
|
|
|
-- { intros i, induction (i : ℕ) with i',
|
|
|
|
|
-- { intro, repeat {rw pow_zero} },
|
|
|
|
|
-- { intro succ_i'_lt_n,
|
|
|
|
|
-- rw [smul_succ, ih (nat.lt_of_succ_lt succ_i'_lt_n), smul_smul, mul_assoc, ← smul_smul, ← smul_smul, ← smul_succ],
|
|
|
|
|
-- have image_q_notin_V : g ^ i'.succ • q ∉ V,
|
|
|
|
|
-- { have i'succ_ne_zero := ne_zero.pos i'.succ,
|
|
|
|
|
-- exact giq_notin_V (⟨ i'.succ, succ_i'_lt_n ⟩ : fin n) i'succ_ne_zero },
|
|
|
|
|
-- exact by_contradiction (λ c, c (by_contradiction (λ c', image_q_notin_V ((rist_supported_in_set h_in_ristV) c')))) } },
|
|
|
|
|
-- -- Combined with g^i q ≠ q, this yields (hg)^i q ≠ q for all 0 < i < n
|
|
|
|
|
-- have hgiq_ne_q : ∀ (i : fin n), (i : ℕ) > 0 → (h * g) ^ (i : ℕ) • q ≠ q,
|
|
|
|
|
-- { intros i i_pos, rw pow_hgq_eq_pow_gq i (fin.is_lt i), by_contra c, exact (giq_notin_V i i_pos) (c.symm ▸ q_in_V) },
|
|
|
|
|
-- -- This even holds for i = n
|
|
|
|
|
-- have hgnq_ne_q : (h * g) ^ n • q ≠ q,
|
|
|
|
|
-- { -- Rewrite (hg)^n q = hg^n q
|
|
|
|
|
-- have npred_lt_n : n.pred < n, exact (nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos n_pos) ▸ (lt_add_one n.pred),
|
|
|
|
|
-- rcases coe_nat_fin npred_lt_n with ⟨ i', i'_eq_pred_n ⟩,
|
|
|
|
|
-- have hgi'q_eq_gi'q := pow_hgq_eq_pow_gq i' (i'_eq_pred_n ▸ npred_lt_n),
|
|
|
|
|
-- have : n = (i' : ℕ).succ := i'_eq_pred_n ▸ (nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos n_pos).symm,
|
|
|
|
|
-- rw [this, smul_succ, hgi'q_eq_gi'q, ← smul_smul, ← smul_succ, ← this],
|
|
|
|
|
-- -- Now it follows from g^n q = q and h q ≠ q
|
|
|
|
|
-- have n_le_period_qg := notfix_le_period' n_pos ((zero_lt_period_le_Sup_periods U_nonempty exp_ne_zero (⟨ q, q_in_U ⟩ : U) g)).1 giq_ne_q,
|
|
|
|
|
-- have period_qg_le_n := (zero_lt_period_le_Sup_periods U_nonempty exp_ne_zero (⟨ q, q_in_U ⟩ : U) g).2, rw ← n_eq_Sup at period_qg_le_n,
|
|
|
|
|
-- exact (ge_antisymm period_qg_le_n n_le_period_qg).symm ▸ ((pow_period_fix q (g : G)).symm ▸ hq_ne_q) },
|
|
|
|
|
-- -- Finally, we derive a contradiction
|
|
|
|
|
-- have period_pos_le_n := zero_lt_period_le_Sup_periods U_nonempty exp_ne_zero (⟨ q, q_in_U ⟩ : U) (⟨ h * g, hg_in_ristU ⟩ : rigid_stabilizer G U),
|
|
|
|
|
-- rw ← n_eq_Sup at period_pos_le_n,
|
|
|
|
|
-- cases (lt_or_eq_of_le period_pos_le_n.2),
|
|
|
|
|
-- { exact (hgiq_ne_q (⟨ (period (q : α) ((h : G) * (g : G))), h_1 ⟩ : fin n) period_pos_le_n.1) (pow_period_fix (q : α) ((h : G) * (g : G))) },
|
|
|
|
|
-- { exact hgnq_ne_q (h_1 ▸ (pow_period_fix (q : α) ((h : G) * (g : G)))) }
|
|
|
|
|
-- end
|
|
|
|
|
-- lemma proposition_2_1 [t2_space α] (f : G) : is_locally_moving G α → (algebraic_centralizer f).centralizer = rigid_stabilizer G (regular_support α f) := sorry
|
|
|
|
|
-- end finite_exponent
|
|
|
|
|
-- variables [topological_space α] [topological_space β] [continuous_mul_action G α] [continuous_mul_action G β]
|
|
|
|
|
-- noncomputable theorem rubin (hα : rubin_action G α) (hβ : rubin_action G β) : equivariant_homeomorph G α β := sorry
|
|
|
|
|
end Rubin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
end Rubin
|