You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
rubin-lean4/Rubin.lean

171 lines
8.3 KiB

/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Laurent Bartholdi. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Author : Laurent Bartholdi
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Card
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Perm
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Subgroup.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Commutator
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Exponent
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.Compact
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation
import Mathlib.Topology.Homeomorph
import Rubin.Tactic
import Rubin.MulActionExt
import Rubin.SmulImage
import Rubin.Support
import Rubin.Topological
import Rubin.RigidStabilizer
import Rubin.Period
import Rubin.AlgebraicDisjointness
import Rubin.RegularSupport
#align_import rubin
namespace Rubin
open Rubin.Tactic
-- TODO: find a home
theorem equiv_congr_ne {ι ι' : Type _} (e : ιι') {x y : ι} : x ≠ y → e x ≠ e y :=
by
intro x_ne_y
by_contra h
apply x_ne_y
convert congr_arg e.symm h <;> simp only [Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
#align equiv.congr_ne Rubin.equiv_congr_ne
----------------------------------------------------------------
section Rubin
variable {G α β : Type _} [Group G]
----------------------------------------------------------------
section RubinActions
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
structure RubinAction (G α : Type _) extends
Group G,
TopologicalSpace α,
MulAction G α,
FaithfulSMul G α
where
locally_compact : LocallyCompactSpace α
hausdorff : T2Space α
no_isolated_points : Rubin.has_no_isolated_points α
locallyDense : LocallyDense G α
#align rubin_action Rubin.RubinAction
end RubinActions
section proposition_2_1
variable {G α : Type _}
variable [Group G]
variable [MulAction G α]
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
variable [T2Space α]
lemma proposition_2_1 (f : G) :
Set.centralizer { g^12 | (g : G) (_ : AlgebraicallyDisjoint f g) } = RigidStabilizer G (RegularSupport α f) :=
by
sorry
end proposition_2_1
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------
-- section finite_exponent
-- lemma coe_nat_fin {n i : } (h : i < n) : ∃ (i' : fin n), i = i' := ⟨ ⟨ i, h ⟩, rfl ⟩
-- variables [topological_space α] [continuous_mul_action G α] [has_faithful_smul G α]
-- lemma distinct_images_from_disjoint {g : G} {V : set α} {n : }
-- (n_pos : 0 < n)
-- (h_disj : ∀ (i j : fin n) (i_ne_j : i ≠ j), disjoint (g ^ (i : ) •'' V) (g ^ (j : ) •'' V)) :
-- ∀ (q : α) (hq : q ∈ V) (i : fin n), (i : ) > 0 → g ^ (i : ) • (q : α) ∉ V :=
-- begin
-- intros q hq i i_pos hcontra,
-- have i_ne_zero : i ≠ (⟨ 0, n_pos ⟩ : fin n), { intro, done },
-- have hcontra' : g ^ (i : ) • (q : α) ∈ g ^ (i : ) •'' V, exact ⟨ q, hq, rfl ⟩,
-- have giq_notin_V := Set.disjoint_left.mp (h_disj i (⟨ 0, n_pos ⟩ : fin n) i_ne_zero) hcontra',
-- exact ((by done : g ^ 0 •'' V = V) ▸ giq_notin_V) hcontra
-- end
-- lemma moves_inj_period {g : G} {p : α} {n : } (period_eq_n : period p g = n) : function.injective (λ (i : fin n), g ^ (i : ) • p) := begin
-- have period_ge_n : ∀ (k : ), 1 ≤ k → k < n → g ^ k • p ≠ p,
-- { intros k one_le_k k_lt_n gkp_eq_p,
-- have := period_le_fix (nat.succ_le_iff.mp one_le_k) gkp_eq_p,
-- rw period_eq_n at this,
-- linarith },
-- exact moves_inj_N period_ge_n
-- end
-- lemma lemma_2_2 {α : Type u_2} [topological_space α] [continuous_mul_action G α] [has_faithful_smul G α] [t2_space α]
-- (U : set α) (U_open : is_open U) (locally_moving : is_locally_moving G α) :
-- U.nonempty → monoid.exponent (rigid_stabilizer G U) = 0 :=
-- begin
-- intro U_nonempty,
-- by_contra exp_ne_zero,
-- rcases (period_from_exponent U U_nonempty exp_ne_zero) with ⟨ p, g, n, n_pos, hpgn, n_eq_Sup ⟩,
-- rcases disjoint_nbhd_fin (moves_inj_period hpgn) with ⟨ V', V'_open, p_in_V', disj' ⟩,
-- dsimp at disj',
-- let V := U ∩ V',
-- have V_ss_U : V ⊆ U := Set.inter_subset_left U V',
-- have V'_ss_V : V ⊆ V' := Set.inter_subset_right U V',
-- have V_open : is_open V := is_open.inter U_open V'_open,
-- have p_in_V : (p : α) ∈ V := ⟨ subtype.mem p, p_in_V' ⟩,
-- have disj : ∀ (i j : fin n), ¬ i = j → disjoint (↑g ^ ↑i •'' V) (↑g ^ ↑j •'' V),
-- { intros i j i_ne_j W W_ss_giV W_ss_gjV,
-- exact disj' i j i_ne_j
-- (Set.subset.trans W_ss_giV (smul''_subset (↑g ^ ↑i) V'_ss_V))
-- (Set.subset.trans W_ss_gjV (smul''_subset (↑g ^ ↑j) V'_ss_V)) },
-- have ristV_ne_bot := locally_moving V V_open (Set.nonempty_of_mem p_in_V),
-- rcases (or_iff_right ristV_ne_bot).mp (Subgroup.bot_or_exists_ne_one _) with ⟨h,h_in_ristV,h_ne_one⟩,
-- rcases faithful_rist_moves_point h_in_ristV h_ne_one with ⟨ q, q_in_V, hq_ne_q ⟩,
-- have hg_in_ristU : (h : G) * (g : G) ∈ rigid_stabilizer G U := (rigid_stabilizer G U).mul_mem' (rist_ss_rist V_ss_U h_in_ristV) (subtype.mem g),
-- have giq_notin_V : ∀ (i : fin n), (i : ) > 0 → g ^ (i : ) • (q : α) ∉ V := distinct_images_from_disjoint n_pos disj q q_in_V,
-- have giq_ne_q : ∀ (i : fin n), (i : ) > 0 → g ^ (i : ) • (q : α) ≠ (q : α),
-- { intros i i_pos giq_eq_q, exact (giq_eq_q ▸ (giq_notin_V i i_pos)) q_in_V, },
-- have q_in_U : q ∈ U, { have : q ∈ U ∩ V' := q_in_V, exact this.1 },
-- -- We have (hg)^i q = g^i q for all 0 < i < n
-- have pow_hgq_eq_pow_gq : ∀ (i : fin n), (i : ) < n → (h * g) ^ (i : ) • q = (g : G) ^ (i : ) • q,
-- { intros i, induction (i : ) with i',
-- { intro, repeat {rw pow_zero} },
-- { intro succ_i'_lt_n,
-- rw [smul_succ, ih (nat.lt_of_succ_lt succ_i'_lt_n), smul_smul, mul_assoc, ← smul_smul, ← smul_smul, ← smul_succ],
-- have image_q_notin_V : g ^ i'.succ • q ∉ V,
-- { have i'succ_ne_zero := ne_zero.pos i'.succ,
-- exact giq_notin_V (⟨ i'.succ, succ_i'_lt_n ⟩ : fin n) i'succ_ne_zero },
-- exact by_contradiction (λ c, c (by_contradiction (λ c', image_q_notin_V ((rist_supported_in_set h_in_ristV) c')))) } },
-- -- Combined with g^i q ≠ q, this yields (hg)^i q ≠ q for all 0 < i < n
-- have hgiq_ne_q : ∀ (i : fin n), (i : ) > 0 → (h * g) ^ (i : ) • q ≠ q,
-- { intros i i_pos, rw pow_hgq_eq_pow_gq i (fin.is_lt i), by_contra c, exact (giq_notin_V i i_pos) (c.symm ▸ q_in_V) },
-- -- This even holds for i = n
-- have hgnq_ne_q : (h * g) ^ n • q ≠ q,
-- { -- Rewrite (hg)^n q = hg^n q
-- have npred_lt_n : n.pred < n, exact (nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos n_pos) ▸ (lt_add_one n.pred),
-- rcases coe_nat_fin npred_lt_n with ⟨ i', i'_eq_pred_n ⟩,
-- have hgi'q_eq_gi'q := pow_hgq_eq_pow_gq i' (i'_eq_pred_n ▸ npred_lt_n),
-- have : n = (i' : ).succ := i'_eq_pred_n ▸ (nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos n_pos).symm,
-- rw [this, smul_succ, hgi'q_eq_gi'q, ← smul_smul, ← smul_succ, ← this],
-- -- Now it follows from g^n q = q and h q ≠ q
-- have n_le_period_qg := notfix_le_period' n_pos ((zero_lt_period_le_Sup_periods U_nonempty exp_ne_zero (⟨ q, q_in_U ⟩ : U) g)).1 giq_ne_q,
-- have period_qg_le_n := (zero_lt_period_le_Sup_periods U_nonempty exp_ne_zero (⟨ q, q_in_U ⟩ : U) g).2, rw ← n_eq_Sup at period_qg_le_n,
-- exact (ge_antisymm period_qg_le_n n_le_period_qg).symm ▸ ((pow_period_fix q (g : G)).symm ▸ hq_ne_q) },
-- -- Finally, we derive a contradiction
-- have period_pos_le_n := zero_lt_period_le_Sup_periods U_nonempty exp_ne_zero (⟨ q, q_in_U ⟩ : U) (⟨ h * g, hg_in_ristU ⟩ : rigid_stabilizer G U),
-- rw ← n_eq_Sup at period_pos_le_n,
-- cases (lt_or_eq_of_le period_pos_le_n.2),
-- { exact (hgiq_ne_q (⟨ (period (q : α) ((h : G) * (g : G))), h_1 ⟩ : fin n) period_pos_le_n.1) (pow_period_fix (q : α) ((h : G) * (g : G))) },
-- { exact hgnq_ne_q (h_1 ▸ (pow_period_fix (q : α) ((h : G) * (g : G)))) }
-- end
-- lemma proposition_2_1 [t2_space α] (f : G) : is_locally_moving G α → (algebraic_centralizer f).centralizer = rigid_stabilizer G (regular_support α f) := sorry
-- end finite_exponent
-- variables [topological_space α] [topological_space β] [continuous_mul_action G α] [continuous_mul_action G β]
-- noncomputable theorem rubin (hα : rubin_action G α) (hβ : rubin_action G β) : equivariant_homeomorph G α β := sorry
end Rubin
end Rubin